Prioritize improvement work transparently
Order candidates with visible impact, confidence, urgency and effort without pretending a score is approval.
Score consistently
- Use one five-point definition for each factor.
- Keep weak evidence visible through confidence.
Respect capacity
- Compare the queue with actual cash and internal-hour budgets.
- Avoid approving more change than the operation can absorb.
Keep judgment
- Use the score to order review, not to replace ownership.
- Record why a lower-scored safety or compliance item proceeds first.
Keep authority explicit
The Improvement Portfolio Studio retains the workflow and complete evidence chain. Its score orders review; it does not authorize a change, prove causality or guarantee a result.